You are driving down the street in Richmond and the subsequent factor you see is flashing lighting fixtures to your rear view mirror.
At excellent, you'll get a rushing ticket or some different form of site visitors violation.Richmond Virginia Traffic Lawyer
Worst case scenario, you're going to be charged with a criminal offense that masquerades as a traffic price tag.
You can be asking, what type of crime could you be charged with for just driving down the street?
Richmond Traffic Court Tickets Lawyer VA Hanover Henrico
Here are the feasible crook charges you may be going through:Reckless DrivingDriving On Suspended LicenseAggressive Driving
So what is the massive deal with any of the above visitors tickets? After all they're just site visitors tickets right?
Wrong. The above tickets are misdemeanors.
What is a misdemeanor price tag? A misdemeanor price ticket might also land you in prison and motive you to lose your license.
So you now have two alternatives when you have acquired a misdemeanor price ticket or dashing price tag.
You can visit court with out a attorney and desire for the nice otherwise you touch the SRIS Law Group lawyers for help.We defend clients charged with site visitors Tckts in Richmond.
We have a customer meeting Location in Richmond, Virginia. You can attain through cellphone at 703-278-0405 or contact us on-line.
Our lawyers guard Virginia uniform summons speeding Tckts, reckless riding Tckts, driving on suspended license and competitive driving Tckts in the following jurisdictions:
Caroline, Hanover, Herico, Chesterfield, Dinwiddie, Prince George, Sussex, Greensville, New Kent, King William, Charles City, James City, Surry, York & Emporia.
The following are a number of the questions our clients ask us after they get a Tckt in Richmond:Do I have to visit the Richmond site visitors court docket if I were given a traffic Tckt in Richmond?If I get too many Richmond Tckts, will it affect my driving report in Virginia?How do I find a Richmond attorney?How much does it price for me to get a lawyer to combat my Richmond v Tckts?The following are a number of the visitors laws in Richmond Virginia:
Virginia Code § forty six.2-870. Maximum velocity limits commonly.
Except as otherwise supplied in this article, the most speed restriction shall be fifty five miles in step with hour on interstate highways or different restricted get entry to highways with divided roadways, nonlimited get right of entry to highways having four or greater lanes, and all kingdom number one highways.
The maximum speed restriction on all other highways will be 55 miles per hour if the car is a passenger motor vehicle, bus, pickup or panel truck, or a motorcycle, but 45 miles consistent with hour on such highways if the car is a truck, tractor truck, or combination of cars designed to transport belongings, or is a motor vehicle being used to tow a automobile designed for self-propulsion, or a house trailer.
Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this phase, the maximum speed restriction shall be 70 miles in line with hour wherein indicated by using lawfully positioned symptoms, erected next to a traffic engineering take a look at and evaluation of available and suitable accident and regulation-enforcement records, on: (i) interstate highways, (ii) multilane, divided, constrained access highways, and (iii) excessive-occupancy automobile lanes if such lanes are bodily separated from regular journey lanes. The maximum pace limit will be 60 miles in step with hour in which indicated by means of lawfully positioned signs and symptoms, erected next to a traffic engineering look at and analysis of to be had and suitable accident and regulation-enforcement statistics, on U.S. Route 29, U.S. Route 58, U.S. Route 360, U.S. Route 460, and on U.S. Route 17 among the metropolis of Port Royal and Saluda where they may be nonlimited get admission to, multilane, divided highways.Virginia Code § forty six.2-862. Exceeding velocity limit.
A character will be responsible of reckless driving who drives a motor car on the highways in the Commonwealth (i) at a speed of twenty miles per hour or greater in extra of the relevant maximum pace restriction or (ii) in extra of eighty miles per hour regardless of the applicable maximum speed limit.Rich. Trfc Virginia
The following is a case this is illustrative of a DUI case in Virginia:
Having discovered defendant William R. Morris power on a public toll road in Orange County on January 10, 1988, a Virginia nation trooper stopped him and charged him with reckless driving, driving below the have an effect on of alcohol (DUI), having flawed registration, and using whilst his license turned into revoked or suspended (driving revoked).
In District Court defendant became convicted of flawed registration, DUI and driving revoked. The conviction for fallacious registration has end up very last, and the DUI and riding revoked convictions had been appealed.
Defendant movements to disregard the DUI and riding revoked prices because he says Virginia Code § 19.2-294 bars further prosecution of those expenses.
The statute, as here pertinent, offers:
If the same act be a contravention of two or more statutes… conviction below considered one of such statutes… shall be a bar to a prosecution… beneath the alternative….
Morris argues that the equal act of driving gave upward push to the expenses of incorrect registration, DUI and riding revoked; that in view that he has been convicted of flawed registration (§ 46.1-64), he can not now be convicted of DUI (§ 18.2-266) or using revoked (§ 46.1-350).
He is based on Padgett v. Commonwealth, 220 v. 758, 263 S.E.second 388 (1980), and cites an unpublished decision of the Circuit Court of Louisa County in 1987 (Commonwealth v. Purdy) which helps his position.
In Padgett, the problem turned into whether or not, notwithstanding Section 19.2-294.1, a defendant can be convicted in one jurisdiction of reckless driving and in any other jurisdiction of DUI arising from a non-stop course of driving.
Virginia Code § 19.2-294.1, enacted through the 1960 Acts, c. 493, p. 767 (then § 19.1-259.1), gives as right here pertinent:
Whenever any individual is charged with a contravention of v Code § 18.2-266 the drunk driving statute… and reckless riding developing out of the identical act or acts and is convicted of any such charges, the court shall brush aside the remaining price.
The adoption of § 19.2-294.1 legislatively changed the rule–for DUI and reckless using cases–of Hundley v. Commonwealth, 193 v. 449, sixty nine S.E.second 336 (1952), in which a defendant become charged with and convicted of DUI and reckless using arising out of a unmarried driving occurrence in Franklin County.
These records the court docket having summarized the proof of using conduct divulge a couple of act. They display two separate acts resulting within the commission ofoffenses, and in such instance the statute then § 19-232, now Section 19.2-294 does now not practice. It is achievable for someone under the impact of intoxicants to power nicely. Many humans no longer below the affect of intoxicants force recklessly. A check of the identification of acts or offenses is whether or not the equal evidence is needed to sustain them; if now not, then the reality that several charges relate to and develop out of one transaction or incidence does not make a unmarried act or offense whereinseparate acts or offenses are defined by statute, as within the immediate case. (citations neglected). 193 v. at 451.
The essence of Padgett is said within the per curiam opinion as follows:
We do now not believe that the difference in venue concerned in this situation alters the singular nature of the act or acts out of which the expenses against the defendant arose. We interpret the language, “the same act or acts,” to mean “the identical act or acts” of using and to contemplate a non-stop, uninterrupted course of operation of a motor automobile, with out regard to the crossing of the boundary line amonglocalities.
The General Assembly changed the rule of thumb of Hundley not by amending now § 19.2-294 however via adding now Section 19.2-294.1 and restricting it to DUI and reckless driving cases.
Padgett makes no connection with § 19.2-294 or Hundley.
Having reviewed the case authority consisting of the posted Circuit Court cases stated through the Commonwealth’s Attorney and with due respect to my colleague presiding over the Circuit Court of Louisa County, I am restrained to conclude that Padgett have to be restricted to its information: a unmarried riding prevalence ensuing in DUI and reckless using prosecutions in exclusive jurisdictions.
In the elements right here pertinent § 19.2-294 has not been amended seeing that 1952 while Hundley was decided. Section 19.2-294.1 is, with the aid of its terms, narrow in scope. The courtroom does no longer find that the General Assembly intends for a single using incident to offer upward thrust to best a single conviction, regardless of what number of statutes are violated, except the statutes violated are the ones restricting DUI and reckless riding.
The motion to disregard the DUI and using revoked prices against Morris could be overruled.
Lynchburg Traffic Court Tickets Attorney Va – Lynchburg Traffic Courtroom Tickets Lawyer Va. There are any Lynchburg Traffic Court Tickets Attorney Va – Lynchburg Traffic Courtroom Tickets Lawyer Va in here.